We respectfully demand that our county, and the cities within it, stop all use of Flock Safety ALPR cameras.
No place to hide
Our public roads have been turned into an unprecedented, for-profit surveillance network. In fact, this is happening all around the country, and Florida is leading the way.
Flock Safety—the surveillance company that is literally blanketing the country, and our state, with its unregulated "vehicle-fingerprinting" cameras—is doing so under the promise of increased public safety, based on claims and statistics that have repeatedly been found to be exaggerated or outright fabricated.
It's an age-old story of exploiting public fear for profit, but with a truly dystopian twist: the company's CEO, Garrett Langley, apparently envisions a future America "where crime no longer exists"—and believes the way to achieve that future is through a 24/7, total-surveillance society.
Never mind the simplistic notion that crime can be “solved” by placing our everyday lives under a microscope, rather than addressing its root causes.
But to blatantly call for what, in most Americans’ minds, is still a dystopian vision—one associated with some of the world’s most brutal authoritarian regimes—is something we simply haven’t seen before.
Nevertheless, Flock’s formidable marketing machine—powered by hundreds of millions in revenue and venture capital—ensures that one police department after another falls for the pitch, allowing the company's mass-surveillance network to spread across the country like poison ivy.
We should all be able to drive to a doctor’s office, a place of worship, or a political rally without being tracked and cataloged by the police. Is that really such a radical idea?
The loss of liberty is still hypothetical, right?
Not really.
Flock’s cameras don’t just capture license plates. They identify vehicles using a “vehicle fingerprint”—recording location, time, travel patterns, and more. This data is stored and shared without a warrant, often across jurisdictions, and with virtually no oversight. And despite company claims to the contrary, it is regularly used in ways that violate both public trust and Flock’s own stated policies.
Here are just a few examples:
— The feds' hidden immigration weapon: Virginia's surveillance network
— ICE Taps into Nationwide AI-Enabled Camera Network, Data Shows
How is this constitutional?
The short answer: it isn’t. But when has a lack of clear constitutional grounding ever stopped law enforcement from adopting new technology—especially when it expands their power?
Flock’s system collects and stores location data on millions of law-abiding people, without a warrant, probable cause, or individual suspicion. Legal scholars have raised serious Fourth Amendment concerns about this kind of mass surveillance.
On February 5, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia ruled that vehicle fingerprinting through pervasive camera surveillance likely violates the Fourth Amendment. The court found that this potential violation constituted a sufficient injury to give plaintiffs standing to sue the City of Norfolk, and it denied the City’s motion to dismiss—both on standing grounds and for failure to state a claim.
What can I do?
1. Join us
As with any grassroots effort, our strength is in numbers and our ability to quickly mobilize when there is a need for swift action. We’ll never share your information with anyone outside our organization—and if we ever receive a government subpoena for it, we’ll fight back and let you know.
2. Put pressure on the Seminole County Commissioners and the local city commissioners of Sanford, Altamonte Springs, Oviedo, Winter Springs, Casselberry, Longwood, and Lake Mary.
The Seminole County Sheriff's Office (SCSO) quietly received approval from the Seminole County Board of County Commissioners on May 23, 2023, under a consent agenda to install ALPR cameras on county infrastructure and rights-of-way. This request was presented by SCSO as a one-year trial of 25 Flock cameras at no cost. The trial quickly expanded into a five-year $1.285m contract for 100 Flock cameras throughout Seminole County. There was no public notice and no opportunity for public debate.
Now is the time for you to voice your concern. Email and call your county and city commissioners. Show up at commission meetings to speak during the public comment periods. Letters to the editor, blog posts, comments at the county and city commission meetings and written comments are all effective ways to publicly express your strong opposition to police, government, and private surveillance of our roads and streets.
3. Share this site far and wide
Spreading the word is how we build power. The only way our voices will be heard is if enough people are raising theirs. Talk to friends and family, send them this link, post it on social media, text it to your group chats. Awareness is the first step to action—and without it, nothing changes.
Let’s make this impossible to ignore.
"Concerns about public safety will eventually recede, but Big Brother will still be watching."
J.D. Tuccille, Reason magazine
Footnotes
1) Police departments love new tech, though, and they rarely turn a critical eye toward it. And, as is often the case with markets, when Flock adoption reached critical mass, almost any rational objection ceased to matter. Many departments are installing the company’s cameras simply because others in their region are also doing so.
2) Apparently, the fact that the societies claiming zero crime are often the ones where the greatest crimes are committed by the symbiosis of government and corporate power has never occurred to Mr. Langley.
Resources
—Why some cities are ditching their Flock license plate readers NPR, Feb 19, 2026
—Ring cancels Flock deal after dystopian Super Bowl ad prompts mass outrage Ars Technica, Feb 13, 2026
—Stop Government Surveillance: Pump the Brakes on ALPRs in Iowa ACLU of Iowa, Jan 30, 2026
—Flock CEO Goes Ballistic on Critics as More Americans Question Mass Driver Surveillance ACLU, Jan 16, 2026
—Police Unmask Millions of Surveillance Targets Because of Flock Redaction Error 404 Media, Jan 13, 2026
—Flock Exposed Its AI-Powered Cameras to the Internet. We Tracked Ourselves 404 Media, Dec 22, 2025
—ACLU and EFF Sue a City Blanketed With Flock Surveillance Cameras 404 Media, Nov 18, 2025
—WA cities reconsider Flock traffic cameras as judge rules their data is public Seattle Times, Nov 18, 2025
—Washington Court Rules That Data Captured on Flock Safety Cameras Are Public Records EFF, Nov 12, 2025
—Police cameras tracked one driver 526 times in four months, lawsuit says NBC News, Sep 18, 2025
—Eastern Iowa residents say AI surveillance cameras lack transparency and regulation Iowa Public Radio, Sep 12, 2025
—Breaking The Creepy AI in Police Cameras Benn Jordan, Aug 26, 2025